[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18141755#comment-18141755
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-3191:
------------------------------------
Folks, I propose a different approach in SOLR-18592 to add a boolean schema
flag like {{matchesWildcard}} (naming TBD). I'm not married to the approach.
I could see setting this on any field marked "large" in the schema. On the
other hand... a "fl" syntax like a minus _sounds_ simple and lesser blast
radius maybe. I recommend furthering the discussion there as the conversation
here seems both overly chatty and also quite historical by this point.
> field exclusion from fl
> -----------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3191
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Luca Cavanna
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch,
> SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch
>
>
> I think it would be useful to add a way to exclude field from the Solr
> response. If I have for example 100 stored fields and I want to return all of
> them but one, it would be handy to list just the field I want to exclude
> instead of the 99 fields for inclusion through fl.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v10.3.26#10030026)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]