[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13957446#comment-13957446
]
Min Zhou edited comment on SPARK-1391 at 4/2/14 8:17 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------
[~sowen]
Yes, there is possibility. It's not a line number, it's instead should have an
index or Otherewise it should be a
user defined exception or native exception. I greped the fastutil source
code, it won't throw AIOOBEs with empty message.
And the line number is not corresponding to the v6.4.4
see line 96 of FastByteArrayOutputStream:
http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/it.unimi.dsi/fastutil/6.4.4/it/unimi/dsi/fastutil/io/FastByteArrayOutputStream.java
Here is the possibility where throws AIOOBEs. The position can be negative due
to line
{noformat}
public void write( final byte[] b, final int off, final int len ) throws
IOException {
...
if ( position + len > length ) length = position += len;
...
}
{noformat}
Here is the simulation with fastutils under the version of 6.4.4
{noformat}
import it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.io.FastByteArrayOutputStream;
public class ArrayOutofIndex {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
FastByteArrayOutputStream outputStream = new
FastByteArrayOutputStream(4096);
outputStream.position(-1);
outputStream.write('a');
outputStream.close();
}
}
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1
at
it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.io.FastByteArrayOutputStream.write(FastByteArrayOutputStream.java:92)
at mzhou.shuffle.perf.ArrayOutofIndex.main(ArrayOutofIndex.java:29)
{noformat}
{noformat}
import it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.io.FastByteArrayOutputStream;
public class ArrayOutofIndex {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
FastByteArrayOutputStream outputStream = new
FastByteArrayOutputStream(4096);
outputStream.position(-1);
outputStream.write(new byte[1024], 0, 1024);
outputStream.close();
}
}
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
at java.lang.System.arraycopy(Native Method)
at
it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.io.FastByteArrayOutputStream.write(FastByteArrayOutputStream.java:98)
at mzhou.shuffle.perf.ArrayOutofIndex.main(ArrayOutofIndex.java:29)
{noformat}
The line number and stack info is not the same as that be reported.
was (Author: coderplay):
[~sowen]
Yes, there is possibility. It's not a line number, it's instead should have an
index or Otherewise it should be a
user defined exception or native exception. I greped the fastutil source
code, it won't throw AIOOBEs with empty message.
And the line number is not corresponding to the v6.4.4
see line 96 of FastByteArrayOutputStream:
http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/it.unimi.dsi/fastutil/6.4.4/it/unimi/dsi/fastutil/io/FastByteArrayOutputStream.java
Here is the possibility where throws AIOOBEs. The position can be negative due
to line
{noformat}
public void More ...write( final byte[] b, final int off, final int len )
throws IOException {
...
if ( position + len > length ) length = position += len;
...
}
{noformat}
Here is the simulation with fastutils under the version of 6.4.4
{noformat}
import it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.io.FastByteArrayOutputStream;
public class ArrayOutofIndex {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
FastByteArrayOutputStream outputStream = new
FastByteArrayOutputStream(4096);
outputStream.position(-1);
outputStream.write('a');
outputStream.close();
}
}
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1
at
it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.io.FastByteArrayOutputStream.write(FastByteArrayOutputStream.java:92)
at mzhou.shuffle.perf.ArrayOutofIndex.main(ArrayOutofIndex.java:29)
{noformat}
{noformat}
import it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.io.FastByteArrayOutputStream;
public class ArrayOutofIndex {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
FastByteArrayOutputStream outputStream = new
FastByteArrayOutputStream(4096);
outputStream.position(-1);
outputStream.write(new byte[1024], 0, 1024);
outputStream.close();
}
}
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
at java.lang.System.arraycopy(Native Method)
at
it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.io.FastByteArrayOutputStream.write(FastByteArrayOutputStream.java:98)
at mzhou.shuffle.perf.ArrayOutofIndex.main(ArrayOutofIndex.java:29)
{noformat}
The line number and stack info is not the same as that be reported.
> BlockManager cannot transfer blocks larger than 2G in size
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-1391
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1391
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Block Manager, Shuffle
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Shivaram Venkataraman
>
> If a task tries to remotely access a cached RDD block, I get an exception
> when the block size is > 2G. The exception is pasted below.
> Memory capacities are huge these days (> 60G), and many workflows depend on
> having large blocks in memory, so it would be good to fix this bug.
> I don't know if the same thing happens on shuffles if one transfer (from
> mapper to reducer) is > 2G.
> 14/04/02 02:33:10 ERROR storage.BlockManagerWorker: Exception handling buffer
> message
> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
> at
> it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.io.FastByteArrayOutputStream.write(FastByteArrayOutputStream.java:96)
> at
> it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.io.FastBufferedOutputStream.dumpBuffer(FastBufferedOutputStream.java:134)
> at
> it.unimi.dsi.fastutil.io.FastBufferedOutputStream.write(FastBufferedOutputStream.java:164)
> at
> java.io.ObjectOutputStream$BlockDataOutputStream.drain(ObjectOutputStream.java:1876)
> at
> java.io.ObjectOutputStream$BlockDataOutputStream.setBlockDataMode(ObjectOutputStream.java:1785)
> at
> java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1188)
> at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:347)
> at
> org.apache.spark.serializer.JavaSerializationStream.writeObject(JavaSerializer.scala:38)
> at
> org.apache.spark.serializer.SerializationStream$class.writeAll(Serializer.scala:93)
> at
> org.apache.spark.serializer.JavaSerializationStream.writeAll(JavaSerializer.scala:26)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManager.dataSerializeStream(BlockManager.scala:913)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManager.dataSerialize(BlockManager.scala:922)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.MemoryStore.getBytes(MemoryStore.scala:102)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManager.doGetLocal(BlockManager.scala:348)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManager.getLocalBytes(BlockManager.scala:323)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManagerWorker.getBlock(BlockManagerWorker.scala:90)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManagerWorker.processBlockMessage(BlockManagerWorker.scala:69)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManagerWorker$$anonfun$2.apply(BlockManagerWorker.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManagerWorker$$anonfun$2.apply(BlockManagerWorker.scala:44)
> at
> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:244)
> at
> scala.collection.TraversableLike$$anonfun$map$1.apply(TraversableLike.scala:244)
> at scala.collection.Iterator$class.foreach(Iterator.scala:727)
> at scala.collection.AbstractIterator.foreach(Iterator.scala:1157)
> at scala.collection.IterableLike$class.foreach(IterableLike.scala:72)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockMessageArray.foreach(BlockMessageArray.scala:28)
> at
> scala.collection.TraversableLike$class.map(TraversableLike.scala:244)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockMessageArray.map(BlockMessageArray.scala:28)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManagerWorker.onBlockMessageReceive(BlockManagerWorker.scala:44)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManagerWorker$$anonfun$1.apply(BlockManagerWorker.scala:34)
> at
> org.apache.spark.storage.BlockManagerWorker$$anonfun$1.apply(BlockManagerWorker.scala:34)
> at
> org.apache.spark.network.ConnectionManager.org$apache$spark$network$ConnectionManager$$handleMessage(ConnectionManager.scala:661)
> at
> org.apache.spark.network.ConnectionManager$$anon$9.run(ConnectionManager.scala:503)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)