[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070604#comment-14070604
]
Aaron edited comment on SPARK-2620 at 7/22/14 6:05 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------
If you look at the diff of distinct from branch-0.9 to master you see
"- def distinct(numPartitions: Int): RDD[T] =
+ def distinct(numPartitions: Int)(implicit ord: Ordering[T] = null):
RDD[T] = "
Is it possible that case classes don't have an implicit ordering and that is
why this fails?
was (Author: aaronjosephs):
If you look at the diff of distinct from branch-0.9 to master you see
- def distinct(numPartitions: Int): RDD[T] =
+ def distinct(numPartitions: Int)(implicit ord: Ordering[T] = null):
RDD[T] =
Is it possible that case classes don't have an implicit ordering and that is
why this fails?
> case class cannot be used as key for reduce
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-2620
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2620
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Spark Core
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Environment: reproduced on spark-shell local[4]
> Reporter: Gerard Maas
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: case-class, core
>
> Using a case class as a key doesn't seem to work properly on Spark 1.0.0
> A minimal example:
> case class P(name:String)
> val ps = Array(P("alice"), P("bob"), P("charly"), P("bob"))
> sc.parallelize(ps).map(x=> (x,1)).reduceByKey((x,y) => x+y).collect
> [Spark shell local mode] res : Array[(P, Int)] = Array((P(bob),1),
> (P(bob),1), (P(abe),1), (P(charly),1))
> In contrast to the expected behavior, that should be equivalent to:
> sc.parallelize(ps).map(x=> (x.name,1)).reduceByKey((x,y) => x+y).collect
> Array[(String, Int)] = Array((charly,1), (abe,1), (bob,2))
> groupByKey and distinct also present the same behavior.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
