[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218850#comment-15218850
]
Regan Dvoskin edited comment on SPARK-13850 at 3/31/16 3:16 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
We're having a query fail on an inner join of two large HIVE tables with the
same stack trace. The query worked on 1.5, and works on 1.6.0 if
spark.memory.useLegacyMode is true, but fails on 1.6.0 when useLegacyMode is
not enabled.
EDIT: 1.6.1 without useLegacyMode enabled also fails with the same exception.
was (Author: dvoskin):
We're having a query fail on an inner join of two large HIVE tables with the
same stack trace. The query worked on 1.5, and works on 1.6.0 if
spark.memory.useLegacyMode is true, but fails on 1.6.0 when useLegacyMode is
not enabled.
EDIT: 1.6.1 without useLegacyMode enabled continues to fail.
> TimSort Comparison method violates its general contract
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-13850
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13850
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Shuffle
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0
> Reporter: Sital Kedia
>
> While running a query which does a group by on a large dataset, the query
> fails with following stack trace.
> {code}
> Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 4077 in stage 1.3 failed 4 times, most
> recent failure: Lost task 4077.3 in stage 1.3 (TID 88702,
> hadoop3030.prn2.facebook.com): java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Comparison
> method violates its general contract!
> at
> org.apache.spark.util.collection.TimSort$SortState.mergeLo(TimSort.java:794)
> at
> org.apache.spark.util.collection.TimSort$SortState.mergeAt(TimSort.java:525)
> at
> org.apache.spark.util.collection.TimSort$SortState.mergeCollapse(TimSort.java:453)
> at
> org.apache.spark.util.collection.TimSort$SortState.access$200(TimSort.java:325)
> at org.apache.spark.util.collection.TimSort.sort(TimSort.java:153)
> at org.apache.spark.util.collection.Sorter.sort(Sorter.scala:37)
> at
> org.apache.spark.util.collection.unsafe.sort.UnsafeInMemorySorter.getSortedIterator(UnsafeInMemorySorter.java:228)
> at
> org.apache.spark.util.collection.unsafe.sort.UnsafeExternalSorter.spill(UnsafeExternalSorter.java:186)
> at
> org.apache.spark.memory.TaskMemoryManager.acquireExecutionMemory(TaskMemoryManager.java:175)
> at
> org.apache.spark.memory.TaskMemoryManager.allocatePage(TaskMemoryManager.java:249)
> at
> org.apache.spark.memory.MemoryConsumer.allocatePage(MemoryConsumer.java:112)
> at
> org.apache.spark.util.collection.unsafe.sort.UnsafeExternalSorter.acquireNewPageIfNecessary(UnsafeExternalSorter.java:318)
> at
> org.apache.spark.util.collection.unsafe.sort.UnsafeExternalSorter.insertRecord(UnsafeExternalSorter.java:333)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeExternalRowSorter.insertRow(UnsafeExternalRowSorter.java:91)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.UnsafeExternalRowSorter.sort(UnsafeExternalRowSorter.java:168)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.Sort$$anonfun$1.apply(Sort.scala:90)
> at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.Sort$$anonfun$1.apply(Sort.scala:64)
> at
> org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$21.apply(RDD.scala:728)
> at
> org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsInternal$1$$anonfun$apply$21.apply(RDD.scala:728)
> at
> org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:38)
> at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:306)
> at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:270)
> at
> org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:38)
> at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:306)
> at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:270)
> at
> org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:38)
> at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:306)
> at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:270)
> at
> org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:38)
> at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:306)
> at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:270)
> at
> org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:38)
> at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:306)
> at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:270)
> at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:66)
> at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:89)
> at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:214)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> Please note that the same query used to succeed in Spark 1.5 so it seems like
> a regression in 1.6.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
