[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225044#comment-15225044
]
Joseph K. Bradley edited comment on SPARK-14376 at 4/4/16 9:07 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Trees and ensembles
* pluggable Impurity functions --> Good to do before too long, but OK to skip
for now.
* stats at tree nodes --> This will require some internal cleanups first.
Forests
* (all ok)
GBTs
* pluggable Loss functions --> Good to do before too long, but OK to skip for
now.
* validation [SPARK-7132]
* evaluateEachIteration --> I'll create a JIRA.
was (Author: josephkb):
Trees and ensembles
* pluggable Impurity functions
* stats at tree nodes
Forests
* (all ok)
GBTs
* pluggable Loss functions
* validation [SPARK-7132]
* evaluateEachIteration
> Review spark.ml parity for trees
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-14376
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14376
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ML
> Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
> Assignee: Joseph K. Bradley
>
> Review parity of spark.ml vs. spark.mllib to ensure spark.ml contains all
> functionality. List all missing items.
> This only covers Scala since we can compare Scala vs. Python in spark.ml
> itself.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
