[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Joseph K. Bradley updated SPARK-14478:
--------------------------------------
    Description: 
Currently, MLlib's StandardScaler scales columns using the corrected standard 
deviation (sqrt of unbiased variance).  This matches what R's scale package 
does.

However, it is a bit odd for 2 reasons:
* Optimization/ML algorithms which require scaled columns generally assume unit 
variance (for mathematical convenience).  That requires using biased variance.
* scikit-learn, MLlib's GLMs, and R's glmnet package all use biased variance.

*Question*: Should we switch to unbiased?

*Decision*: No.  Document what we do, and possibly add support for unbiased 
later on.

  was:
Currently, MLlib's StandardScaler scales columns using the unbiased standard 
deviation.  This matches what R's scale package does.

However, it is a bit odd for 2 reasons:
* Optimization/ML algorithms which require scaled columns generally assume unit 
variance (for mathematical convenience).  That requires using biased variance.
* scikit-learn, MLlib's GLMs, and R's glmnet package all use biased variance.

*Question*: Should we switch to unbiased?

*Decision*: No.  Document what we do, and possibly add support for unbiased 
later on.


> Should StandardScaler use biased variance to scale?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-14478
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14478
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Question
>          Components: ML, MLlib
>            Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>            Assignee: Joseph K. Bradley
>
> Currently, MLlib's StandardScaler scales columns using the corrected standard 
> deviation (sqrt of unbiased variance).  This matches what R's scale package 
> does.
> However, it is a bit odd for 2 reasons:
> * Optimization/ML algorithms which require scaled columns generally assume 
> unit variance (for mathematical convenience).  That requires using biased 
> variance.
> * scikit-learn, MLlib's GLMs, and R's glmnet package all use biased variance.
> *Question*: Should we switch to unbiased?
> *Decision*: No.  Document what we do, and possibly add support for unbiased 
> later on.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to