[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

jay vyas updated SPARK-15563:
-----------------------------
    Description: 
PROBLEM

Spark packages should be extensible as a mechanism for individual application 
developers to build productionable blueprints, and should be 
consumable/rebuildable/verifiable by robots.  Otherwise, there is a danger that 
a "spark package" might just be a link to a github repo without any useful code 
in it. 

SOLUTION

The spark-packages guidelines should enforce that either a `build.sbt`, 
`build.gradle`, `pom.xml`, or a `Makefile` present as part of the submission 
process.   Although this doesnt gaurantee one step, automatic builds, it is a 
pretty good measure of a projects status as a reproducible, maintainable 
artifact for the community.  

I assume the spark-packages are a community maintained standard so the ASF 
Spark project is a good place to put this into the documentation.

  was:
PROBLEM

Spark packages should be extensible as a mechanism for individual application 
developers to build productionable blueprints, and should be 
consumable/rebuildable/verifiable by robots.  Otherwise, there is a danger that 
a "spark package" might just be a link to a github repo without any useful code 
in it. 

SOLUTION

The spark-packages guidelines should enforce that either a `build.sbt`, 
`build.gradle`, `pom.xml`, or a `Makefile` present as part of the submission 
process.  

I assume the spark-packages are a community maintained standard so the ASF 
Spark project is a good place to put this into the documentation.


> Packages specification
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-15563
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15563
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: jay vyas
>
> PROBLEM
> Spark packages should be extensible as a mechanism for individual application 
> developers to build productionable blueprints, and should be 
> consumable/rebuildable/verifiable by robots.  Otherwise, there is a danger 
> that a "spark package" might just be a link to a github repo without any 
> useful code in it. 
> SOLUTION
> The spark-packages guidelines should enforce that either a `build.sbt`, 
> `build.gradle`, `pom.xml`, or a `Makefile` present as part of the submission 
> process.   Although this doesnt gaurantee one step, automatic builds, it is a 
> pretty good measure of a projects status as a reproducible, maintainable 
> artifact for the community.  
> I assume the spark-packages are a community maintained standard so the ASF 
> Spark project is a good place to put this into the documentation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to