[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

mahendra singh updated SPARK-16618:
-----------------------------------
    Description: spark naive bayes does not support for binary classification . 
I checked with both ML and MLLIB . According to current scenario Naive bayes 
only support multi class classification . We have to write code for binary 
classification also .As we know logistic regression support binary 
classification .   Mean we can not get ROC and PR curve using spark naive , 
even if we give only two class( category or distinct label values)  (was: spark 
naive bayes does not support for binary classification . I checked with both ML 
and MLLIB . According to current scenario Naive bayes only support multi class 
classification . We have to write code for binary classification also .As we 
know logistic regression support binary classification .   )

> Binary classification using Naive bayes 
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-16618
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16618
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ML, MLlib
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.2
>            Reporter: mahendra singh
>             Fix For: 1.6.3
>
>   Original Estimate: 96h
>  Remaining Estimate: 96h
>
> spark naive bayes does not support for binary classification . I checked with 
> both ML and MLLIB . According to current scenario Naive bayes only support 
> multi class classification . We have to write code for binary classification 
> also .As we know logistic regression support binary classification .   Mean 
> we can not get ROC and PR curve using spark naive , even if we give only two 
> class( category or distinct label values)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to