[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15417254#comment-15417254
]
Roi Reshef commented on SPARK-17020:
------------------------------------
Also note that I have just called:
*data.cache().count()*
val rdd = data.rdd.setName("rdd").cache()
rdd.count
and the rdd was distributed far better (similar to "data" DataFrame)
I'm not sure it solves the issue with the rdd that ignores repartitioning
methods further down the road. I'll have to check that
> Materialization of RDD via DataFrame.rdd forces a poor re-distribution of data
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-17020
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17020
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Spark Core, SQL
> Affects Versions: 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 2.0.0
> Reporter: Roi Reshef
> Attachments: dataframe_cache.PNG, rdd_cache.PNG
>
>
> Calling DataFrame's lazy val .rdd results with a new RDD with a poor
> distribution of partitions across the cluster. Moreover, any attempt to
> repartition this RDD further will fail.
> Attached are a screenshot of the original DataFrame on cache and the
> resulting RDD on cache.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
