[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15593479#comment-15593479 ]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-18038: -------------------------------------- User 'tejasapatil' has created a pull request for this issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15575 > Move output partitioning definition from UnaryNodeExec to its children > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SPARK-18038 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18038 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: SQL > Affects Versions: 2.0.1 > Reporter: Tejas Patil > Priority: Trivial > > This was a suggestion by [~rxin] over one of the dev list discussion : > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Project-not-preserving-child-partitioning-td19417.html > {noformat} > I think this is very risky because preserving output partitioning should not > be a property of UnaryNodeExec (e.g. exchange). > It would be better (safer) to move the output partitioning definition into > each of the operator and remove it from UnaryExecNode. > {noformat} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org