[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15678218#comment-15678218
]
Joseph K. Bradley commented on SPARK-18319:
-------------------------------------------
I agree with the "probably ready to be unmarked" items.
Among the items "to be discussed," I would recommend unmarking:
* LabeledPoint: simple & safe
* MLWriter/Reader (able): These are pretty thin APIs, so I think it's
reasonable to unmark them.
* AFTSurvivalRegression (I have not heard complaints. But I'm OK with leaving
it Experimental too since there may be few users trying it out.)
I would prefer to leave the summaries and GeneralizedLinearRegression as
Experimental since they have seen significant changes in 2.1. I'm ambivalent
about the Evaluators since they work reasonably well but do not fit some use
cases (such as computing more stats at once, which several people have
mentioned over time).
> ML, Graph 2.1 QA: API: Experimental, DeveloperApi, final, sealed audit
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-18319
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18319
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Documentation, GraphX, ML, MLlib
> Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
> Assignee: yuhao yang
> Priority: Blocker
>
> We should make a pass through the items marked as Experimental or
> DeveloperApi and see if any are stable enough to be unmarked.
> We should also check for items marked final or sealed to see if they are
> stable enough to be opened up as APIs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
