[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14166417#comment-14166417
]
Sean Owen commented on SPARK-3894:
----------------------------------
This is an ancient religious war. At Google, it was the 80s vs 120s, and
eventually the 120s won after a long bitter battle (email thread really).
I have not heard anyone argue for 160, and the best practical argument against
it is that it makes it hard even on largeish screens to have two editors side
by side. Even 120 does sometimes.
Even if the standard became 160, the entire code base is wrapped at 100, and
we'd have code that is vastly 100 characters wide with a bit of 160. I
personally think 100 is just fine.
> Scala style: line length increase to 160
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-3894
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3894
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Project Infra
> Reporter: sjk
>
> 100 is shorter
> our screen is bigger
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
