[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15851500#comment-15851500
]
Takeshi Yamamuro commented on SPARK-16043:
------------------------------------------
I think the issue this ticket describes has been almost resolved in SPARK-14850.
How about setting `Resolved` about this? And then, if we have other left issues
related to this, it'd be better to open new JIRAs, thought?
> Prepare GenericArrayData implementation specialized for a primitive array
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-16043
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16043
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SQL
> Reporter: Kazuaki Ishizaki
>
> There is a ToDo of GenericArrayData class, which is to eliminate
> boxing/unboxing for a primitive array (described
> [here|https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/GenericArrayData.scala#L31])
> It would be good to prepare GenericArrayData implementation specialized for a
> primitive array to eliminate boxing/unboxing from the view of runtime memory
> footprint and performance.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
