[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16078825#comment-16078825
]
Dongjoon Hyun commented on SPARK-21344:
---------------------------------------
Hi, [~shubhamc].
Thank you for reporting. I just change the priority since `Blocker` is set by
committers.
> BinaryType comparison does signed byte array comparison
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-21344
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21344
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 2.1.1
> Reporter: Shubham Chopra
>
> BinaryType used by Spark SQL defines ordering using signed byte comparisons.
> This can lead to unexpected behavior. Consider the following code snippet
> that shows this error:
> {code}
> case class TestRecord(col0: Array[Byte])
> def convertToBytes(i: Long): Array[Byte] = {
> val bb = java.nio.ByteBuffer.allocate(8)
> bb.putLong(i)
> bb.array
> }
> def test = {
> val sql = spark.sqlContext
> import sql.implicits._
> val timestamp = 1498772083037L
> val data = (timestamp to timestamp + 1000L).map(i =>
> TestRecord(convertToBytes(i)))
> val testDF = sc.parallelize(data).toDF
> val filter1 = testDF.filter(col("col0") >= convertToBytes(timestamp) &&
> col("col0") < convertToBytes(timestamp + 50L))
> val filter2 = testDF.filter(col("col0") >= convertToBytes(timestamp +
> 50L) && col("col0") < convertToBytes(timestamp + 100L))
> val filter3 = testDF.filter(col("col0") >= convertToBytes(timestamp) &&
> col("col0") < convertToBytes(timestamp + 100L))
> assert(filter1.count == 50)
> assert(filter2.count == 50)
> assert(filter3.count == 100)
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
