[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14204486#comment-14204486
]
Sean Owen commented on SPARK-1739:
----------------------------------
Sounds great. Even better if old PRs with no review can get an automated
comment pinging the maintainer. Not sure if that is easy or not.
> Close PR's after period of inactivity
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-1739
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1739
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Project Infra
> Reporter: Patrick Wendell
> Assignee: Josh Rosen
>
> Sometimes PR's get abandoned if people aren't responsive to feedback or it
> just falls to a lower priority. We should automatically close stale PR's in
> order to keep the queue from growing infinitely.
> I think we just want to do this with a friendly message that says "This seems
> inactive, please re-open this if you are interested in contributing the
> patch.". We should also explicitly ping any reviewers (via @mentioning) them
> and ask them to provide feedback one way or the other, for instance, if the
> feature is being rejected.
> This will help us avoid letting features slip through the cracks by forcing
> some action when there is no activity after 30 days. Also, it's ASF policy
> that we should really be tracking our feature backlog and prioritization in
> JIRA and only be using Github for active reviews.
> I don't think we should close it if there was _no_ feedback from any reviewer
> - in that case we should leave it open (we should be providing at least some
> feedback on all incoming patches).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
