[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14220232#comment-14220232
 ] 

Anant Daksh Asthana commented on SPARK-4038:
--------------------------------------------

So AVF is based on k-modes for detecting outliers which is similar in
spirit to k-means. We could add the k-modes algorithm and have the avf
outlier detection as an add on or extension to it. We could do a similar
thing detecting outliers with k-means etc too



> Outlier Detection Algorithm for MLlib
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-4038
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4038
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: MLlib
>            Reporter: Ashutosh Trivedi
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The aim of this JIRA is to discuss about which parallel outlier detection 
> algorithms can be included in MLlib. 
> The one which I am familiar with is Attribute Value Frequency (AVF). It 
> scales linearly with the number of data points and attributes, and relies on 
> a single data scan. It is not distance based and well suited for categorical 
> data. In original paper  a parallel version is also given, which is not 
> complected to implement.  I am working on the implementation and soon submit 
> the initial code for review.
> Here is the Link for the paper
> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=4410382
> As pointed out by Xiangrui in discussion 
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/MLlib-Contributing-Algorithm-for-Outlier-Detection-td8880.html
> There are other algorithms also. Lets discuss about which will be more 
> general and easily paralleled.
>    



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to