[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16436185#comment-16436185
]
Erik Erlandson commented on SPARK-23891:
----------------------------------------
The question of what OS base to use for "canonical" images or dockerfiles is an
open one. The use of alpine was influenced by the relatively small image size
that resulted. We could entertain arguments about why debian, centos, or some
other OS, might be an advantage.
The current position of the Apache Spark project is that the dockerfiles
shipped with the project are for reference, and as an aid to users building
their own images for use with the kubernetes back-end. IMO, the project should
not get into the business of supporting _multiple_ dockerfiles at the present
time. In the future, if/when the "container image api" stabilizes further, we
might reconsider maintaining multiple dockerfiles.
I'm interested if others have different point of view; my take currently is
that if users would like to construct similar dockerfiles using an alternative
base OS, it would be great to publish that as a github project where interested
community members could use it.
> Debian based Dockerfile
> -----------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-23891
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23891
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Kubernetes
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0
> Reporter: Sercan Karaoglu
> Priority: Minor
>
> Current dockerfile inherits from alpine linux which causes netty tcnative ssl
> bindings to fail while loading which is the case when we use Google Cloud
> Platforms Bigtable Client on top of spark cluster. would be better to have
> another debian based dockerfile
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
