[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16471295#comment-16471295
 ] 

Matt Cheah commented on SPARK-24248:
------------------------------------

I see - I suppose if the watch connection drops, we should try to reestablish 
connection to the API server periodically, and when we can reestablish it we 
can do a full sync then?

> [K8S] Use the Kubernetes cluster as the backing store for the state of pods
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-24248
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24248
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Kubernetes
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Matt Cheah
>            Priority: Major
>
> We have a number of places in KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend right now 
> that maintains the state of pods in memory. However, the Kubernetes API can 
> always give us the most up to date and correct view of what our executors are 
> doing. We should consider moving away from in-memory state as much as can in 
> favor of using the Kubernetes cluster as the source of truth for pod status. 
> Maintaining less state in memory makes it so that there's a lower chance that 
> we accidentally miss updating one of these data structures and breaking the 
> lifecycle of executors.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to