[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16520666#comment-16520666
 ] 

Joseph K. Bradley commented on SPARK-19498:
-------------------------------------------

Sure, comments are welcome!  Or links to JIRAs, whichever are easier.

> Discussion: Making MLlib APIs extensible for 3rd party libraries
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-19498
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19498
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Brainstorming
>          Components: ML
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>            Priority: Critical
>
> Per the recent discussion on the dev list, this JIRA is for discussing how we 
> can make MLlib DataFrame-based APIs more extensible, especially for the 
> purpose of writing 3rd-party libraries with APIs extended from the MLlib APIs 
> (for custom Transformers, Estimators, etc.).
> * For people who have written such libraries, what issues have you run into?
> * What APIs are not public or extensible enough?  Do they require changes 
> before being made more public?
> * Are APIs for non-Scala languages such as Java and Python friendly or 
> extensive enough?
> The easy answer is to make everything public, but that would be terrible of 
> course in the long-term.  Let's discuss what is needed and how we can present 
> stable, sufficient, and easy-to-use APIs for 3rd-party developers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to