[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16736582#comment-16736582
]
Hyukjin Kwon commented on SPARK-25823:
--------------------------------------
Looks [~Thincrs] bot is still active. I'm going to ask directly via emails. If
the bot is still active, I'm going to open an infra JIRA to ben this bot.
> map_filter can generate incorrect data
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-25823
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25823
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Dongjoon Hyun
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: correctness
>
> This is not a regression because this occurs in new high-order functions like
> `map_filter` and `map_concat`. The root cause is Spark's `CreateMap` allows
> the duplication. If we want to allow this difference in new high-order
> functions, we had better add some warning about this different on these
> functions after RC4 voting pass at least. Otherwise, this will surprise
> Presto-based users.
> *Spark 2.4*
> {code:java}
> spark-sql> CREATE TABLE t AS SELECT m, map_filter(m, (k,v) -> v=2) c FROM
> (SELECT map_concat(map(1,2), map(1,3)) m);
> spark-sql> SELECT * FROM t;
> {1:3} {1:2}
> {code}
> *Presto 0.212*
> {code:java}
> presto> SELECT a, map_filter(a, (k,v) -> v = 2) FROM (SELECT
> map_concat(map(array[1],array[2]), map(array[1],array[3])) a);
> a | _col1
> -------+-------
> {1=3} | {}
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
