David Stewart Zink created SPARK-27332:
------------------------------------------

             Summary: Filter Pushdown duplicates expensive ScalarSubquery 
(discarding result)
                 Key: SPARK-27332
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-27332
             Project: Spark
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Optimizer
    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
            Reporter: David Stewart Zink


Test Query:  SELECT a,b FROM r0 WHERE a <= (SELECT AVG(a) from r1) LIMIT 5000

r0,r1 have schema \{a:Double, b:String}

IF r0 is a CsvRelation than no problem, but if it is a ParquetRelation then the 
table scan is performed twice and the AVG(a) is simply discarded in one branch. 
This appears to have something to do with pushing the filter down into the 
table scan.

Breakpoints in ScalarSubquery's methods updateResult(), eval(), and doGenCode() 
seems sufficient to demonstrate that one of the two computed scalars is never 
used.

The duplicated ScalarSubquery can be seen in this (physical) plan:
{noformat}
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project ['a, 'b]
+- 'Filter ('a <= scalar-subquery#8 [])
   :  +- 'Project [unresolvedalias('AVG('a), None)]
   :     +- 'UnresolvedRelation `r1`
   +- 'UnresolvedRelation `r0`

== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
a: double, b: string
Project [a#9, b#10]
+- Filter (a#9 <= scalar-subquery#8 [])
   :  +- Aggregate [avg(a#15) AS avg(a)#22]
   :     +- SubqueryAlias `r1`
   :        +- Project [a#15, b#16]
   :           +- Relation[a#15,b#16] 
CsvRelation(<function0>,Some(/tmp/r1),true,,,",\,#,PERMISSIVE,COMMONS,false,false,true,StructType(StructField(a,DoubleType,false),
 StructField(b,StringType,true)),false,null,,null)
   +- SubqueryAlias `r0`
      +- Project [a#9, b#10]
         +- Relation[a#9,b#10] parquet

== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Filter (isnotnull(a#9) && (a#9 <= scalar-subquery#8 []))
:  +- Aggregate [avg(a#15) AS avg(a)#22]
:     +- Project [a#15]
:        +- Relation[a#15,b#16] 
CsvRelation(<function0>,Some(/tmp/r1),true,,,",\,#,PERMISSIVE,COMMONS,false,false,true,StructType(StructField(a,DoubleType,false),
 StructField(b,StringType,true)),false,null,,null)
+- Relation[a#9,b#10] parquet

== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Project [a#9, b#10]
+- *(1) Filter (isnotnull(a#9) && (a#9 <= Subquery subquery8))
   :  +- Subquery subquery8
   :     +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[avg(a#15)], 
output=[avg(a)#22])
   :        +- Exchange SinglePartition
   :           +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_avg(a#15)], 
output=[sum#27, count#28L])
   :              +- *(1) Scan 
CsvRelation(<function0>,Some(/tmp/r1),true,,,",\,#,PERMISSIVE,COMMONS,false,false,true,StructType(StructField(a,DoubleType,false),
 StructField(b,StringType,true)),false,null,,null) [a#15] PushedFilters: [], 
ReadSchema: struct<a:double>
   +- *(1) FileScan parquet [a#9,b#10] Batched: true, Format: Parquet, 
Location: InMemoryFileIndex[file:/tmp/r0], PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: 
[IsNotNull(a)], ReadSchema: struct<a:double,b:string>
         +- Subquery subquery8
            +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[avg(a#15)], 
output=[avg(a)#22])
               +- Exchange SinglePartition
                  +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_avg(a#15)], 
output=[sum#27, count#28L])
                     +- *(1) Scan 
CsvRelation(<function0>,Some(/tmp/r1),true,,,",\,#,PERMISSIVE,COMMONS,false,false,true,StructType(StructField(a,DoubleType,false),
 StructField(b,StringType,true)),false,null,,null) [a#15] PushedFilters: [], 
ReadSchema: struct<a:double>
{noformat}
Whereas when I change r0 to be a CsvRelation:
{noformat}
== Parsed Logical Plan ==
'Project ['a, 'b]
+- 'Filter ('a <= scalar-subquery#0 [])
   :  +- 'Project [unresolvedalias('AVG('a), None)]
   :     +- 'UnresolvedRelation `r1`
   +- 'UnresolvedRelation `r0`

== Analyzed Logical Plan ==
a: double, b: string
Project [a#1, b#2]
+- Filter (a#1 <= scalar-subquery#0 [])
   :  +- Aggregate [avg(a#7) AS avg(a)#14]
   :     +- SubqueryAlias `r1`
   :        +- Project [a#7, b#8]
   :           +- Relation[a#7,b#8] 
CsvRelation(<function0>,Some(/tmp/r1),true,,,",\,#,PERMISSIVE,COMMONS,false,false,true,StructType(StructField(a,DoubleType,false),
 StructField(b,StringType,true)),false,null,,null)
   +- SubqueryAlias `r0`
      +- Project [a#1, b#2]
         +- Relation[a#1,b#2] 
CsvRelation(<function0>,Some(/tmp/r0),true,,,",\,#,PERMISSIVE,COMMONS,false,false,true,StructType(StructField(a,DoubleType,false),
 StructField(b,StringType,true)),false,null,,null)

== Optimized Logical Plan ==
Filter (a#1 <= scalar-subquery#0 [])
:  +- Aggregate [avg(a#7) AS avg(a)#14]
:     +- Project [a#7]
:        +- Relation[a#7,b#8] 
CsvRelation(<function0>,Some(/tmp/r1),true,,,",\,#,PERMISSIVE,COMMONS,false,false,true,StructType(StructField(a,DoubleType,false),
 StructField(b,StringType,true)),false,null,,null)
+- Relation[a#1,b#2] 
CsvRelation(<function0>,Some(/tmp/r0),true,,,",\,#,PERMISSIVE,COMMONS,false,false,true,StructType(StructField(a,DoubleType,false),
 StructField(b,StringType,true)),false,null,,null)

== Physical Plan ==
*(1) Filter (a#1 <= Subquery subquery0)
:  +- Subquery subquery0
:     +- *(2) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[avg(a#7)], output=[avg(a)#14])
:        +- Exchange SinglePartition
:           +- *(1) HashAggregate(keys=[], functions=[partial_avg(a#7)], 
output=[sum#19, count#20L])
:              +- *(1) Scan 
CsvRelation(<function0>,Some(/tmp/r1),true,,,",\,#,PERMISSIVE,COMMONS,false,false,true,StructType(StructField(a,DoubleType,false),
 StructField(b,StringType,true)),false,null,,null) [a#7] PushedFilters: [], 
ReadSchema: struct<a:double>
+- *(1) Scan 
CsvRelation(<function0>,Some(/tmp/r0),true,,,",\,#,PERMISSIVE,COMMONS,false,false,true,StructType(StructField(a,DoubleType,false),
 StructField(b,StringType,true)),false,null,,null) [a#1,b#2] PushedFilters: [], 
ReadSchema: struct<a:double,b:string>
{noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to