[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16975851#comment-16975851
 ] 

Sean R. Owen commented on SPARK-29931:
--------------------------------------

I think it's OK to deprecate them if they're legacy. I don't think we have to 
commit to 4.0, although that's likely. It's conceivable there could a reason to 
do it later, or sooner.

> Declare all SQL legacy configs as will be removed in Spark 4.0
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-29931
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29931
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Maxim Gekk
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Add the sentence to descriptions of all legacy SQL configs existed before 
> Spark 3.0: "This config will be removed in Spark 4.0.". Here is the list of 
> such configs:
> * spark.sql.legacy.execution.pandas.groupedMap.assignColumnsByName
> * spark.sql.legacy.literal.pickMinimumPrecision
> * spark.sql.legacy.allowCreatingManagedTableUsingNonemptyLocation
> * spark.sql.legacy.sizeOfNull
> * spark.sql.legacy.replaceDatabricksSparkAvro.enabled
> * spark.sql.legacy.setopsPrecedence.enabled
> * spark.sql.legacy.integralDivide.returnBigint
> * spark.sql.legacy.bucketedTableScan.outputOrdering
> * spark.sql.legacy.parser.havingWithoutGroupByAsWhere
> * spark.sql.legacy.dataset.nameNonStructGroupingKeyAsValue
> * spark.sql.legacy.setCommandRejectsSparkCoreConfs
> * spark.sql.legacy.utcTimestampFunc.enabled
> * spark.sql.legacy.typeCoercion.datetimeToString
> * spark.sql.legacy.looseUpcast
> * spark.sql.legacy.ctePrecedence.enabled
> * spark.sql.legacy.arrayExistsFollowsThreeValuedLogic



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to