[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maciej Szymkiewicz updated SPARK-30629:
---------------------------------------
Description:
This problem surfaced while handling SPARK-22817. In theory there are tests,
which cover that problem, but it seems like they have been dead for some reason.
Reproducible example
{code:r}
f <- function(x) {
f(x)
}
newF <- cleanClosure(f)
{code}
was:
This problem surfaced while handling SPARK-22817. In theory there are tests,
which cover that problem, but it seems like they have been dead for some reason.
Reproducible example
{code:r}
f <- function(x) {
f(x)
}
newF <- cleanClosure(f)
{code}
Just looking at the {{cleanClosure}} / {{processClosure}} pair, that function
that is being processed is not added to {{checkedFuncs}}.
> cleanClosure on recursive call leads to node stack overflow
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-30629
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30629
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SparkR
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Maciej Szymkiewicz
> Priority: Major
>
> This problem surfaced while handling SPARK-22817. In theory there are tests,
> which cover that problem, but it seems like they have been dead for some
> reason.
> Reproducible example
> {code:r}
> f <- function(x) {
> f(x)
> }
> newF <- cleanClosure(f)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
