[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dongjoon Hyun updated SPARK-28817:
----------------------------------
    Affects Version/s:     (was: 2.4.3)
                       3.0.0

> Support standard Javadoc packaging to allow automatic javadoc location 
> settings
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-28817
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28817
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Spark Core
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>         Environment: Sure, if you can figure out how to enable deploying of 
> javadoc artifacts with the release, that'd do it. I think they're already 
> built of course, just not part of what gets pushed. From a quick look at the 
> build, I don't see what if anything would disable those artifacts, and I see 
> them built locally. The copy script also seems to take all .jar files. It's a 
> legit enhancement just not something I immediately see how to fix.
>            Reporter: Marc Le Bihan
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently Spark javadoc is only accessible here : 
> [http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/api/java]
> Maven isn't able to find it, through a _maven dependency:resolve 
> -Dclassifier=javadoc_ and Eclipse, for example, isn't able to set javadoc 
> location automatically to good location.
> Therefore, each developper
> in each sub-project of his project that uses Spark,
> must edit each jar related to spark (about ten)
> and set manually the http location of the javadoc.
> Now 99% of the API available on Maven respect the standard of delivering a 
> separate downloadable javadoc through the javadoc classifer.
> Can Spark respect this standard too ?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to