Leanken.Lin created SPARK-32644:
-----------------------------------

             Summary: NAAJ support for ShuffleHashJoin when AQE is on
                 Key: SPARK-32644
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32644
             Project: Spark
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: SQL
    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
            Reporter: Leanken.Lin


In [SPARK-32290|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32290], we managed 
to optimize NAAJ scenario from BNLJ to BHJ, but skipped the checking the 
BuildSide plan with *spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold* parameter, which 
means in very bad case, BuildSide Plan being to big might cause Driver OOM. So 
the NAAJ support for  ShuffledHashJoin is important as well.

 

The support of SHJ for NAAJ has some difficulties in NullKey scenario, as for 
normal HashedRelation and EmtpyHashedRelation, the code logical should be the 
same when it comes to BHJ and SHJ, but if NullKey exists in global BuildSide 
data, and only one partition could be built into 
EmptyHashedRelationWithAllNullKeys, and this partition was not able to do *fast 
stop* for the entire RDD. So after offline talked with some committer and 
discussion, decided to support NAAJ for SHJ when AQE is on, because when AQE is 
on, Shuffle will be pre-executed, and we should be able to know that whether 
the BuildSide contains NullKey or not before the actual JOIN executed.

 

Basically, In NAAJ SHJ Implementation, we collected information whether 
BuildSide is Empty or contains NullKey, and keep these information in 
ShuffleExchangeExec Metrics, and during AQE, we rewritten these two case into 
LocalTableScan and StreamedSidePlan to Avoid NAAJ, as for the normal relation, 
we processed it in Distributed style.

 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to