[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17325031#comment-17325031
 ] 

Yuanjian Li commented on SPARK-34198:
-------------------------------------

Thanks all for joining the discussion!

Databricks decided to donate the commercial implementation of the 
RocksDBStateStore implementation. I just linked the design doc for this. The 
code work will start this week. Please help with reviewing the design and PRs. 
Hope we can have this great feature in the 3.2 release!

> Add RocksDB StateStore as external module
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-34198
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34198
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Structured Streaming
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>            Reporter: L. C. Hsieh
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently Spark SS only has one built-in StateStore implementation 
> HDFSBackedStateStore. Actually it uses in-memory map to store state rows. As 
> there are more and more streaming applications, some of them requires to use 
> large state in stateful operations such as streaming aggregation and join.
> Several other major streaming frameworks already use RocksDB for state 
> management. So it is proven to be good choice for large state usage. But 
> Spark SS still lacks of a built-in state store for the requirement.
> We would like to explore the possibility to add RocksDB-based StateStore into 
> Spark SS. For the concern about adding RocksDB as a direct dependency, our 
> plan is to add this StateStore as an external module first.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to