[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-43118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17711667#comment-17711667
 ] 

Snoot.io commented on SPARK-43118:
----------------------------------

User 'jerrypeng' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40767

> Remove unnecessary assert for UninterruptibleThread in KafkaMicroBatchStream
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-43118
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-43118
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Structured Streaming
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.2
>            Reporter: Boyang Jerry Peng
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The assert 
>  
> {code:java}
>  assert(Thread.currentThread().isInstanceOf[UninterruptibleThread]) {code}
>  
> found 
> [https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/connector/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaMicroBatchStream.scala#L239]
>  
>  
> is not needed.  The reason is the following
>  
>  # This assert was put there due to some issues when the old and deprecated 
> KafkaOffsetReaderConsumer is used.  The default offset reader implementation 
> has been changed to KafkaOffsetReaderAdmin which no longer require it run via 
> UninterruptedThread.
>  # Even if the deprecated KafkaOffsetReaderConsumer is used, there are 
> already asserts in that impl to check if it is running via 
> UninterruptedThread e.g. 
> [https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/connector/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaOffsetReaderConsumer.scala#L130]
>  thus the assert in KafkaMicroBatchStream is redundant.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to