[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15088638#comment-15088638
 ] 

Michael Armbrust commented on SPARK-12704:
------------------------------------------

I think this explanation might be clearer with with actual queries and their 
plans.  That said "wrong" is a pretty strong term.  Do you mean sub-optimal?

> we may repartition a relation even it's not needed
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-12704
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12704
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>            Reporter: Wenchen Fan
>
> The implementation of {{HashPartitioning.compatibleWith}} has been wrong for 
> a while. Think of the following case:
> if {{table_a}} is hash partitioned by int column `i`, and {{table_b}} is also 
> partitioned by int column `i`, logically these 2 partitionings are 
> compatible. However, {{HashPartitioning.compatibleWith}} will return false 
> for this case as the {{AttributeReference}} of column `i` between these 2 
> tables have different expr ids.
> With this wrong result of {{HashPartitioning.compatibleWith}}, we will go 
> into [this 
> branch|https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Exchange.scala#L390]
>  and may add unnecessary shuffle.
> This won't impact correctness if the join keys are exactly the same with hash 
> partitioning keys, as there’s still an opportunity to ​not​ partition that 
> child in that branch: 
> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Exchange.scala#L428
> However, if the join keys are a super-set of hash partitioning keys, for 
> example, {{table_a}} and {{table_b}} are both hash partitioned by column `i`, 
> and we wanna join them using column `i, j`, logically we don't need shuffle 
> but in fact the 2 tables start out as partitioned only by `i` and is 
> redundantly repartitioned by `i, j`.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to