[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16832507#comment-16832507
]
Ethan Li edited comment on STORM-3388 at 5/3/19 1:44 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes we will keep non-container solution. We are adding runc-solution as a
plugin so that storm users can switch from different solutions. And the cgroup
solution will also be kept.
In one of our current dev environment (Rhel7), we have one supervisor using
docker and another supervisor using runc.
I have to mention that:
Docker and runc only works on Rhel7. They will not work on Rhel6 because they
are not available.
Current cgroup solution will not work on Rhel7 because the usage of cgroup on
Rhel7 is different than Rhel6.
was (Author: ethanli):
Yes we will keep non-container solution. We are adding runc-solution as a
plugin so that storm users can switch from different solutions. In one of our
current dev environment (Rhel7), we have one supervisor using docker and
another supervisor using runc. And the cgroup solution will also be kept.
Docker and runc only works on Rhel7. They will not work on Rhel6 because they
are not available.
Current cgroup solution will not work on Rhel7 because the usage of cgroup on
Rhel7 is different than Rhel6.
> Launch workers inside container using runc runtime
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-3388
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3388
> Project: Apache Storm
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Ethan Li
> Assignee: Ethan Li
> Priority: Major
>
> Have been working on this. Will push it back after fully tested
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
