[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Antoine Tran updated STORM-3533:
--------------------------------
    Description: Storm 2.0.0 release page 
[here|http://storm.apache.org/2019/05/30/storm200-released.html] suggest us to 
put storm-server as test scope for testing. But RAS packages are in 
storm-server package too, and we need it when we launch our topology. Some of 
RAS packages should be either integrated in storm-core or in a distinct package 
storm-ras, so that we do not have to put storm-server as compile test, which we 
do for now.  (was: Storm 2.0.0 release page 
([here|[http://storm.apache.org/2019/05/30/storm200-released.html])] suggest us 
to put storm-server as test scope for testing. But RAS packages are in 
storm-server package too, and we need it when we launch our topology. Some of 
RAS packages should be either integrated in storm-core or in a distinct package 
storm-ras, so that we do not have to put storm-server as compile test, which we 
do for now.)

> Make a distinct storm-ras artifact
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-3533
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3533
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: storm-client, storm-core, storm-server
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>         Environment: CentOs 7.7
> Storm 2.0.0
> Maven 3.5.3
> OpenJdk 8
>            Reporter: Antoine Tran
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Storm 2.0.0 release page 
> [here|http://storm.apache.org/2019/05/30/storm200-released.html] suggest us 
> to put storm-server as test scope for testing. But RAS packages are in 
> storm-server package too, and we need it when we launch our topology. Some of 
> RAS packages should be either integrated in storm-core or in a distinct 
> package storm-ras, so that we do not have to put storm-server as compile 
> test, which we do for now.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to