bossenti commented on issue #2106: URL: https://github.com/apache/streampipes/issues/2106#issuecomment-1807556520
thanks for investigating @muyangye I agree with you that this kind of workaround should be avoided. I would propose that we change the configuration of the InfluxSink such that it can only expect primitive fields. In this case, the user is directly warned in the UI that the data stream is not suitable for being persisted in the influx storage. However, this might cause some inconveniencies but is definitely better than the current state of just ignoring these fields. To slightly improve here, we could think about providing a hint somewhere in our documentation proposing workarounds for the user. In addition, we need to think about how this affects the automatic pipeline creation in case the user selects `persist data` during the adapter creation. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
