[ 
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2889?page=comments#action_37570 ] 

James Mitchell commented on STR-2889:
-------------------------------------

Patch applied, however I want to leave this open while more tweaks (if any) are 
made.

Thanks again.

> Updated Checkstyle rules
> ------------------------
>
>          Key: STR-2889
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2889
>      Project: Struts Action 1
>         Type: Improvement

>   Components: Core, Apps, EL, Extras, Faces, Scripting, Taglibs, Tiles
>     Versions: 1.2 Family, 1.3 Family
>  Environment: Any
>     Reporter: Frank W. Zammetti
>  Attachments: checkstyle_rules.patch
>
> Argh, I have the priority choices... shouldn't there be something in between 
> minor and major?!?  But I digress...
> With reference to this thread on the @dev list:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/struts-dev/200606.mbox/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> Attached is a patch for the Checkstyle rules that eliminates the two things 
> discussed in this thread.  It resolves a few hundred exceptions in core alone 
> (350-400, give or take), and should do the same for all other subprojects.  
> There seemed to be a feeling (don't want to say consensus at this point!) 
> that applying this before the next milestone would be acceptable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to