The @Value annotation should be allowed on getter/setter methods in addition to
fields
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: SHALE-202
URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-202
Project: Shale
Type: Improvement
Components: Tiger
Reporter: Craig McClanahan
Resolution of SHALE-185 goes part way towards improving the general usability
of @Property (nee @Value). However, it would also be better to allow use of
this annotation on a JavaBeans setter or getter method too (where the default
property name was derived from the method name, but could still be overridden
by the "name" attribute on the annotation). This would be more consistent with
the annotations defined by things like the Java Persistence Architecture, where
you can define such annotations on either place.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
