[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SITE-8?page=comments#action_37757 
] 
            
Ted Husted commented on SITE-8:
-------------------------------

I guess what really bothers me is the use of  .x for Struts 1 and .0 for Struts 
2. So, I'll go for the minimum change of changing the website location from 
/2.0/ to /2.x/, and leave the rest alone. 

So we will have archival versions of the documentation for specific releases at 
/1.2.9,  /1.3.5, /2.0.0 and so forth, and the head of each major release series 
at 1.x and 2.x. 

-T.


> Website archive handling
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: SITE-8
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SITE-8
>             Project: Shared resources
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ted Husted
>
> We have started to provide archives of past GA releases on the website under 
> folders named for the version. 
> * http://struts.apache.org/1.2.9/
> We could start creating the versioned folders upfront and then redirecting 
> from struts/1.2 to struts/1.2.9, and so forth.
> If we want to do that, then we should setup physical folders for 1.3.5  and 
> 2.0.0 and setup the appropriate redirects for struts/1.3 and struts/2.0 to 
> the latest versions. Then once each version rolls, we could create the 1.3.6 
> and 2.0.1 folders and update the redirects.
> In this way, people could link to Struts/1.3 or Struts/2.0 and be directed to 
> the site for the latest working milestone in the each minor series. We could 
> also create redirects for Struts/1.x and Struts/2.x to link to the lastest GA 
> milestoren for each major release series. 
> One issue to consider is what do we do if a version does not go GA. If we had 
> been doing this all along, then we would have created a website folder for 
> 1.3.1. Would we have kept 1.3.1 around once we decided it was a permanent 
> Alpha, or do we delete folders for versions that we know are not going GA?
> If we are careful to constrain the references to a specific version of the 
> website, it would be possible to remove "beta" release sites, so that we only 
> retain  the GA sites over time.
> For background see: 
> * http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40struts.apache.org/msg23359.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to