[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1376?page=comments#action_37768
]
Ted Husted commented on WW-1376:
--------------------------------
OK, next question, what about
<!DOCTYPE validators PUBLIC
"-//OpenSymphony Group//XWork Validator 1.0//EN"
"http://www.opensymphony.com/xwork/xwork-validator-1.0.2.dtd";>
My own preference would be to create "one DTD to rule them all".
I'd like to work toward being able to define an entire workflow in a single
configuration file, actions, validations, as well as localized text -- but
still be able to have separate files with different kinds of elements, as we do
today. One strategy doesn't obviate the other.
-Ted.
> Struts configuration files should be named struts.xml, not xwork.xml
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WW-1376
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1376
> Project: Struts 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Configuration
> Reporter: Don Brown
> Assigned To: Don Brown
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> As part of the renaming and WW cleanup process, I think Struts should have
> its own configuration DTD, so users would use it and not the XWork one.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
