[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1473?page=comments#action_38443 ] tm_jee commented on WW-1473: ----------------------------
Just some thoughs after reading Phil's comment on having those templates in the webapp folder and they are cached properly. If we have them in the webapp/WEB-INF/classes, i am guessing (i didn't try it out) it might work as well. Classes in webapp/WEB-INF/classes should be loaded before jars (according to the spec if i remember it correctly), so i guess the one in webapp/WEB-INF/classes should get picked up first. just a thought. > Freemarker performance / caching issue in UI Tags > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WW-1473 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1473 > Project: Struts 2 > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Views, Component Management > Affects Versions: 2.0.1 > Reporter: tm_jee > Fix For: 2.0.2 > > > There's been some performance problem (resulting inFM not caching properly) > related to UI tag. see > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.freemarker.user/2555/match=freemarker+performance+ww > > and > http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?messageID=85432 > for more info. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
