[ 
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_42328
 ] 

Brian Pontarelli commented on WW-2192:
--------------------------------------

Let's also make sure to include this in the plug-in documentation, because it 
is really vital to allowing plugins the opportunity to provide configuration. 
Should we open another issue just to be certain, or re-open this to include the 
documentation as well?

> Rework ConfigurationProvider loading
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WW-2192
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2192
>             Project: Struts 2
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Configuration
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.10
>            Reporter: Brian Pontarelli
>            Assignee: Don Brown
>             Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>
> Currently, the only mechanism for loading custom ConfigurationProviders is to 
> add them to web.xml (roughly speaking), which makes it difficult for plugins 
> to supply additional ConfigurationProviders without requiring the user of the 
> plugin to modify their web.xml file(s).
> This feature would allow plugins to supply additional ConfigurationProviders 
> within the struts-plugin.xml file as standard bean definitions or as a new 
> configuration definition. 
> The Container injection framework would probably need to first load all the 
> ConfigurationProviders only and hand those to the Dispatcher so that it can 
> be bootstrapped. Next, the Container would load the rest of the beans and 
> values as normal. This would require a change in the initialization 
> life-cycle of the Struts framework and possibly changes the the 
> struts-plugin.xml definition (DTD or schema).
> Also, because a Struts application could now handle many different types of 
> configuration much more transparently, the ConfigurationProvider interface 
> should provide some new life-cycle methods that allow ConfigurationProviders 
> to do pre and post processing. An example of how this would be necessary is 
> for handling index actions. A ConfigurationProvider might need to determine 
> if an action exists in a particular namespace prior to setting up additional 
> results and new actions. Therefore, it would be nice to have the ability to 
> load all the configuration and then post process the configuration so that 
> all of the namespaces, actions and results are setup.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to