[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13216752#comment-13216752
]
Rees Byars commented on WW-3753:
--------------------------------
Thanks for the quick action! And I apologize for overlooking the
AnnotationValidationInterceptorTest in my patch.
> The AnnotationActionValidatorManager does not adhere to the
> ActionValidatorManager interface's contract
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WW-3753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3753
> Project: Struts 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Rees Byars
> Assignee: Lukasz Lenart
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.3.2
>
> Attachments: ww3753_patch
>
>
> An ActionValidatorManager accepts a java.util.String "context" parameter for
> identifying the appropriate configurations. In the
> AnnotationActionValidatorManager's buildValidatorKey() method, however,
> "config.getName()" is used instead of the passed-in context. This violates
> the contract of the interface and tightly couples the
> AnnotationActionValidatorManager to the ValidationInterceptor.
> I have a situation whereby I have created my own validation interceptor for a
> special case that passes in a context not derived from
> "proxy.getActionName()" (equivalent to config.getName() except for in the
> case of wildcards), only to find that this context isn't used properly by the
> manager. I then created my own manager, changing only the
> buildValidatorKey() to use the given context, and it works well.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
