[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15123746#comment-15123746
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on WW-4594:
------------------------------------

Github user lukaszlenart commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/85#discussion_r51284673
  
    --- Diff: 
apps/showcase/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/showcase/tiles/TilesAnnotationsAction.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
    +package org.apache.struts2.showcase.tiles;
    +
    +import org.apache.struts2.convention.annotation.Namespace;
    +import org.apache.struts2.convention.annotation.ParentPackage;
    +import org.apache.struts2.convention.annotation.Result;
    +import org.apache.struts2.tiles.annotation.TilesDefinition;
    +import org.apache.struts2.tiles.annotation.TilesPutAttribute;
    +
    +import com.opensymphony.xwork2.ActionSupport;
    +
    +@Namespace("/tiles")
    +@ParentPackage("tiles")
    +@Result(name = "success", type="tiles")
    +@TilesDefinition(extend = "showcase.annotations", putAttributes = {
    +        @TilesPutAttribute(name = "header", value = 
"/WEB-INF/tiles/header.jsp"),
    +        @TilesPutAttribute(name = "body", value = 
"/WEB-INF/tiles/body.ftl"), })
    --- End diff --
    
    I think the last comma isn't needed and also what do you think about 
formatting like this:
    ```java
    @Namespace("/tiles")
    @ParentPackage("tiles")
    @Result(name = "success", type="tiles")
    @TilesDefinition(extend = "showcase.annotations", putAttributes = {
        @TilesPutAttribute(name = "header", value = 
"/WEB-INF/tiles/header.jsp"),
        @TilesPutAttribute(name = "body", value = "/WEB-INF/tiles/body.ftl")
    })
    ```
    ?


> Configure TilesDefs by annotating Actions
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WW-4594
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4594
>             Project: Struts 2
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Plugin - Tiles
>            Reporter: Christoph Nenning
>            Assignee: Christoph Nenning
>             Fix For: 2.5
>
>
> Large applications often consist of hundrets of actions. IMO it is a major 
> benefit of struts-convention-plugin that it is not necessary to configure all 
> those actions in xml files. As xml files would become huge and hard to 
> maintain. The same applies to tiles xml files. Currently it is necessary to 
> configure tiles-definitions for all those actions in xml files which makes 
> them huge and hard to maintain.
> It would be great if configuration of tiles-definitions could be done by 
> annotating actions, in a similar way actions can be configured with 
> annotations from convention-plugin.
> This somewhat relates to WW-3937 and WW-4161



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to