[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-5288?focusedWorklogId=852083&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-852083 ]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on WW-5288: -------------------------------------- Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created on: 21/Mar/23 18:29 Start Date: 21/Mar/23 18:29 Worklog Time Spent: 10m Work Description: lukaszlenart commented on PR #664: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/664#issuecomment-1478397004 Do you plan to document this option? Issue Time Tracking ------------------- Worklog Id: (was: 852083) Time Spent: 2h (was: 1h 50m) > Make excluded package exemption logic more strict > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WW-5288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-5288 > Project: Struts 2 > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core > Reporter: Kusal Kithul-Godage > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 6.2.0 > > Time Spent: 2h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Following on from the discussion in the comments on WW-5268 - exempting > classes from excluded packages should only be done if unavoidable. > Given this, I realised we should make the exemption logic more strict to > prevent incorrect use and inadvertent exempting of more OGNL expressions than > intended. > * Currently, the exempted classes also match against superclasses. This is > unnecessary and we can match against only the specific class. > * Currently, an exemption against either the target or member class suffices. > This can be made more strict by requiring an exemption for the class which > matches the excluded package specifically, which could be either or both. > * The JavaDoc for the options should be very explicit in what each > configuration option achieves to prevent incorrect uses. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)