[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16169317#comment-16169317
 ] 

Chad Sterling commented on SVN-4698:
------------------------------------

Thanks,

Sorry about that, missed that part about the mailing list. Good luck with
the product.

Chad


On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:49 AM Johan Corveleyn (JIRA) <[email protected]>



> Comment thread on revision
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: SVN-4698
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4698
>             Project: Subversion
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: svnserve
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>         Environment: Any supported configuration of subversion.
>            Reporter: Chad Sterling
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> There are times when new information about a commit is discovered after the 
> fact. Trivial cases of this are empty commit messages or forgotten line items 
> on a commit. However at times it may be discovered that a certain change had 
> an unintended side effect, or that the change has other features that are 
> worth documenting. 
> One current solutions to this problem are to use a third party tool to allow 
> discussion which has the downside that when the repository is moved the 
> useful documentation is lost/disconnected, and the comment thread is not 
> default viewable when logs are queried from the repository.
> A second option is to allow log messages to be edited after the fact which 
> has the consequence that historical commits can no longer be considered 
> immutable, as the log messages can be erased or changed to have a different 
> meaning.
> What is suggested would be to allow a comment thread to be attached to the 
> log such that developers could have a conversation about a particular commit 
> without altering the original log message.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to