[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14019038#comment-14019038
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-839:
-------------------------------------

Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/17#discussion_r13454332
  
    --- Diff: 
tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/planner/PhysicalPlannerImpl.java 
---
    @@ -886,6 +883,9 @@ public PhysicalExec createScanPlan(TaskAttemptContext 
ctx, ScanNode scanNode, St
             }
           }
     
    +      if (ctx.getTable(scanNode.getCanonicalName()) == null) {
    --- End diff --
    
    It seems to be a code for safety. I couldn't find this case in all unit 
tests. If so, it would be Ok. Please let me know if my guess is wrong.


> If all tables participate in the BROADCAST JOIN, there is some missing data.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-839
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-839
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Hyoungjun Kim
>            Assignee: Hyoungjun Kim
>            Priority: Minor
>
> See title. 
> If all tables participate in the BROADCAST JOIN and table has several files, 
> there is some missing data.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to