Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/99#issuecomment-51736398
The main idea looks good to me. It will mitigate lock contention problem.
I have one suggestion. How about changing getState(boolean) and getState
signatures into different names? Since the uses of them may be sensitive, we
need to know what we invoke more apparently.
I would like to suggest getSynchronizedState() and getState(). It's just a
suggestion. The decision is up to you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
