[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14137404#comment-14137404
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-1049:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user hyunsik opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/147

    TAJO-1049: Remove the parallel degree limit up to the maximum cluster ca...

    ...pacity.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/hyunsik/tajo TAJO-1049

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/147.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #147
    
----
commit bdeedac47697b072f8d32e5673a4651e611bf6c7
Author: Hyunsik Choi <[email protected]>
Date:   2014-09-17T15:37:01Z

    TAJO-1049: Remove the parallel degree limit up to the maximum cluster 
capacity.

----


> Remove the parallel degree limit up to the maximum cluster capacity
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-1049
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1049
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: data shuffle, distributed query plan
>            Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
>            Assignee: Hyunsik Choi
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>         Attachments: TAJO-1049.patch
>
>
> The maximum parallel degree had been limited by the number of cluster node 
> capacity. This was because the old hash shuffle approach created too many 
> small files depending on the number of parallel degree of a stage.
> But, TAJO-992 solved this problem. We don't need to use this limit anymore. 
> This patch removes the limit.
> I think that this patch requires cluster test and it is hard to verify this 
> patch in unit tests.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to