[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14172197#comment-14172197
 ] 

Hudson commented on TAJO-1107:
------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Tajo-block_iteration-branch-build #15 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Tajo-block_iteration-branch-build/15/])
TAJO-1107: Broadcast join on non-leaf node scans only first data file. 
(babokim: rev 5f64cbb1a64e2bcc034fb3f82c65ae448cb824bd)
* 
tajo-core/src/test/resources/results/TestJoinBroadcast/testMultiplePartitionedBroadcastDataFileWithZeroLength.result
* 
tajo-core/src/test/resources/queries/TestJoinBroadcast/testMultiplePartitionedBroadcastDataFileWithZeroLength2.sql
* 
tajo-core/src/test/resources/queries/TestJoinBroadcast/testMultipleBroadcastDataFileWithZeroLength2.sql
* 
tajo-core/src/test/resources/results/TestJoinBroadcast/testMultipleBroadcastDataFileWithZeroLength2.result
* CHANGES
* tajo-core/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/query/TestJoinBroadcast.java
* 
tajo-core/src/test/resources/results/TestJoinBroadcast/testMultiplePartitionedBroadcastDataFileWithZeroLength2.result
* 
tajo-core/src/test/resources/queries/TestJoinBroadcast/testMultiplePartitionedBroadcastDataFileWithZeroLength.sql
* tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/master/querymaster/Repartitioner.java


> Broadcast join on non-leaf node scans only first data file.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-1107
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1107
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Hyoungjun Kim
>            Assignee: Hyoungjun Kim
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>
> Fragments are determined by the Repartitioner. In the case of broadcast join 
> Repartitioner uses different determine login according to node type(lead, 
> non-leaf).
> Currently Tajo only uses first data file when broadcast join is non-leaf 
> node. This is the cause of incorrect results. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to