[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14237556#comment-14237556
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-1234:
--------------------------------------

Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/290#issuecomment-66033616
  
    Thank you all guys for the quick review.
    
    @jihoonson TajoConstants.UTC_TIMEZONE is used for a system default config. 
In contrast, the unit tests were written to test the behavior of different time 
zones. So, I'll change the constant name to SYSTEM_DEFAULT_TIMEZONE.
    
    I'll commit it shortly due to unit test failure. If there are further 
feedback, I'll reflect them later in another jira.


> Rearrange timezone in date/time types
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-1234
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1234
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: data type, planner/optimizer
>            Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
>            Assignee: Hyunsik Choi
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.9.1
>
>         Attachments: TAJO-1234.patch, TAJO-1234_2.patch, TAJO-1234_3.patch, 
> TAJO-1234_4.patch, TAJO-1234_5.patch, TAJO-1234_6.patch
>
>
> Currently, the master branch causes unit test failures. It's because that 
> some inconsistent timezone usages. The main purpose of this issue is to 
> cleanup and rearrange timezone usages.
> I discussed this issue with [~jungjw] at 
>  * http://markmail.org/thread/qhsizgp2pnd6swjq
>  * http://markmail.org/message/3nqecl34l2ayxg2x
> I'll fix some parts as I mentioned in above mailing list threads.
> In sum, 
>  * Tajo will have only four points which consider timezone:
>    ** query statement 
>    ** Input table
>    ** text printout in TajoCli
>    ** Casting from text to either time or timestamp
>   * All other parts have to deal with TIME and TIMESTAMP values as UTC value



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to