[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14260921#comment-14260921
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-269:
-------------------------------------

Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/322#discussion_r22341820
  
    --- Diff: tajo-plan/src/main/proto/Plan.proto ---
    @@ -26,58 +26,280 @@ import "CatalogProtos.proto";
     import "DataTypes.proto";
     
     enum NodeType {
    -  BST_INDEX_SCAN = 0;
    -  EXCEPT = 1;
    +  SET_SESSION = 0;
    +
    +  ROOT = 1;
       EXPRS = 2;
    -  DISTINCT_GROUP_BY = 3;
    -  GROUP_BY = 4;
    -  HAVING = 5;
    -  JOIN = 6;
    -  INSERT = 7;
    -  INTERSECT = 8;
    -  LIMIT = 9;
    -  PARTITIONS_SCAN = 10;
    -  PROJECTION = 11;
    -  ROOT = 12;
    -  SCAN = 13;
    -  SELECTION = 14;
    -  SORT = 15;
    -  STORE = 16;
    -  TABLE_SUBQUERY = 17;
    -  UNION = 18;
    -  WINDOW_AGG = 19;
    -
    -  CREATE_DATABASE = 20;
    -  DROP_DATABASE = 21;
    -  CREATE_TABLE = 22;
    -  DROP_TABLE = 23;
    -  ALTER_TABLESPACE = 24;
    -  ALTER_TABLE = 25;
    -  TRUNCATE_TABLE = 26;
    -}
    -
    -message LogicalPlan {
    -  required KeyValueSetProto adjacentList = 1;
    +  PROJECTION = 3;
    +  LIMIT = 4;
    +  WINDOW_AGG = 5;
    +  SORT = 6;
    +  HAVING = 7;
    +  GROUP_BY = 8;
    +  DISTINCT_GROUP_BY = 9;
    +  SELECTION = 10;
    +  JOIN = 11;
    +  UNION = 12;
    +  INTERSECT = 13;
    +  EXCEPT = 14;
    +  TABLE_SUBQUERY = 15;
    +  SCAN = 16;
    +  PARTITIONS_SCAN = 17;
    +  BST_INDEX_SCAN = 18;
    +  STORE = 19;
    +  INSERT = 20;
    +
    +  CREATE_DATABASE = 21;
    +  DROP_DATABASE = 22;
    +  CREATE_TABLE = 23;
    +  DROP_TABLE = 24;
    +  ALTER_TABLESPACE = 25;
    +  ALTER_TABLE = 26;
    +  TRUNCATE_TABLE = 27;
     }
     
    -message LogicalNode {
    -  required int32 pid = 1;
    -  required NodeType type = 2;
    -  required SchemaProto in_schema = 3;
    -  required SchemaProto out_schema = 4;
    -  required NodeSpec spec = 5;
    +message LogicalNodeTree {
    +  repeated LogicalNode nodes = 1;
     }
     
    -message NodeSpec {
    -  optional ScanNode scan = 1;
    +message LogicalNode {
    +  required int32 sid = 1;
    --- End diff --
    
    That's good idea. I'll change them.


> Protocol buffer De/Serialization for LogicalNode
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-269
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-269
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: query master, worker
>            Reporter: Jihoon Son
>            Assignee: Hyunsik Choi
>             Fix For: 0.10
>
>         Attachments: TAJO-269.patch, TAJO-269_2.patch
>
>
> In the current implementation, the logical plan is serialized into a JSON 
> object and sent to each worker.
> However, the transmission of JSON object incurs the high overhead due to its 
> large size.
> ProtocolBuffer is a good alternative because its overhead is quite small and 
> already used in other modules of Tajo.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to