[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14379328#comment-14379328
 ] 

Jinho Kim edited comment on TAJO-1397 at 3/25/15 5:37 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------

If you don't start this issue yet, I will create a sub task for this.


was (Author: jhkim):
If you don't start this issue yet, please assign to me.

> Resource allocation should be fine grained.
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-1397
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1397
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: query master, resource manager, worker
>            Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
>            Assignee: Hyunsik Choi
>             Fix For: 0.11.0
>
>         Attachments: ResoruceSequence.jpg, old_resource_circuit.png, 
> resource_circuit.png
>
>
> See the comment:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-540?focusedCommentId=14359478&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14359478
> From the discussion in TAJO-540
> {quote}
> In general, query (or job) scheduler aims at the maximum resource 
> utilization. For multi-tenancy, we also need to consider the fairness for 
> multiple users (or queries). BTW, the maximum resource utilization and 
> fairness are usually conflict to each other in many cases. To mitigate this 
> problem, many scheduler seems to use preemption approach.
> In this point, our resource and scheduler system has the following problems:
>  * A query exclusively uses allocated resources at the first time until the 
> query is completed or failed.
>  * There is no mechanism to deallocate resources during query processing.
>  * Preempt is also not allowed.
> To achieve the multi tenancy, we should change our resource circulation. 
> Especially, resource allocation must be fine grained instead of per query.
> So, I'll create a jira issue to change the resource circulation. We have to 
> do this issue firstly in my opinion. If we achieve this, implementing 
> multi-tenant scheduler would be much easier than now. It would be a good 
> starting point of this issue.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to