[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14491850#comment-14491850
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-1415:
--------------------------------------

Github user sirpkt commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/454#discussion_r28211475
  
    --- Diff: tajo-plan/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/plan/ExprAnnotator.java 
---
    @@ -678,8 +679,26 @@ public EvalNode visitGeneralSetFunction(Context ctx, 
Stack<Expr> stack, GeneralS
         }
       }
     
    +
       public static final Set<String> WINDOW_FUNCTIONS =
    -      Sets.newHashSet("row_number", "rank", "dense_rank", "percent_rank", 
"cume_dist", "first_value", "lag");
    +      Sets.newHashSet("row_number", "rank", "dense_rank", "percent_rank", 
"cume_dist", "ntile", "first_value", "last_value", "lag");
    +
    +  public static final Set<String> NONFRAMABLE_WINDOW_FUNCTIONS =
    +      Sets.newHashSet("row_number", "rank", "dense_rank", "percent_rank", 
"cume_dist", "ntile", "lag", "lead");
    +  public static final Set<String> FRAMABLE_WINDOW_FUNCTIONS =
    +      Sets.newHashSet("first_value", "last_value", "nth_value");
    +
    +  public static FunctionType getFunctionType(String functionName, boolean 
distinct) {
    +//    if 
(NONFRAMABLE_WINDOW_FUNCTIONS.contains(functionName.toLowerCase()) || 
FRAMABLE_WINDOW_FUNCTIONS.contains(functionName.toLowerCase())) {
    +    if (WINDOW_FUNCTIONS.contains(functionName.toLowerCase())) {
    +      if (distinct && functionName.equalsIgnoreCase("row_number")) {
    +        throw new NoSuchFunctionException("row_number() does not support 
distinct keyword.");
    --- End diff --
    
    I just made a function wrapper for the code and did not change the code 
itself, 
    however, I think ```distinct``` should be allowed with ```row_number()``` 
as we can use ```distinct row_number()``` in other DBMSs.
    I'll check further about that.


> Window frame support
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-1415
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1415
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: distributed query plan, parser, physical operator, 
> planner/optimizer
>            Reporter: Keuntae Park
>            Assignee: Keuntae Park
>             Fix For: window function
>
>
> We can define frame clause in window definition like
> {code}
> [ RANGE | ROWS ] frame_start
> [ RANGE | ROWS ] BETWEEN frame_start AND frame_end
> {code}
> , where frame_start and frame_end can be one of 
> {code}
> UNBOUNDED PRECEDING
> value PRECEDING
> CURRENT ROW
> value FOLLOWING
> UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
> {code}
> According to the window functions description of 
> PostgreSQL(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/functions-window.html),
> there are two types of window functions based on window frame support.
> 1) row_number, rank, dense_rank, percent_rank, cume_dist, tile, lag and lead:
> these functions only work within window partition, which means window frame 
> has no effect on these functions.
> 2) first_value, last_value, nth_value, and aggregation function as as window 
> function: these functions should work with rows within window frame.
> Currently, Tajo parser recognize the window frame grammar but windowAggExec 
> does not use that information. 
> It works as if window frame is set as "RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUND PROCEEDING AND 
> UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING", which is different from the default window frame 
> setting of most DBMSs "RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUND PROCEEDING AND CURRENT ROW".
> Following should be done:
> 1) Applying correct default window frame for first_value, last_value, 
> nth_value, and aggregation functions .
> 2) Supporting various window frame expressions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to