[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14727093#comment-14727093
]
Tajo QA commented on TAJO-1738:
-------------------------------
{color:red}*-1 overall.*{color} Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12753715/TAJO-1738_3.patch
against master revision release-0.9.0-rc0-435-gf2c4343.
{color:green}+1 @author.{color} The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included.{color} The patch appears to include 8 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac.{color} The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc.{color} The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javadoc warnings.
{color:green}+1 checkstyle.{color} The patch generated 0 code style errors.
{color:red}-1 findbugs.{color} The patch appears to cause Findbugs
(version 2.0.3) to fail.
{color:green}+1 release audit.{color} The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests.{color} The patch passed unit tests in tajo-cli
tajo-client tajo-cluster-tests tajo-common tajo-core-tests tajo-jdbc
tajo-storage/tajo-storage-common tajo-storage/tajo-storage-hbase
tajo-storage/tajo-storage-hdfs.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TAJO-Build/838//testReport/
Findbugs results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TAJO-Build/838//findbugsResult
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-TAJO-Build/838//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Improve off-heap RowBlock
> -------------------------
>
> Key: TAJO-1738
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1738
> Project: Tajo
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Storage
> Reporter: Jinho Kim
> Assignee: Jinho Kim
> Fix For: 0.11.0, 0.12.0
>
> Attachments: TAJO-1738.patch, TAJO-1738_2.patch, TAJO-1738_3.patch
>
>
> OffHeapRowBlock was added by TAJO-907. but it does not support memory pooling.
> We already use the Netty PooledByteBufAllocator to DelimitedTextFile. and we
> can easy to add the implementation by PooledByteBufAllocator
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
